ContactSearchSite MapHome
School ImprovementThe MCASCommunityResources
Home School Improvement >  Education Reform Studies
The Status of Ed Reform in Masachusetts
PDF VersionPrint Version
Section One
Section Two
Section Three

Achievement

The second goal - really the major goal of this effort - was to bring up student achievement so that all students would meet high standards. The additional money was supposed to buy better results. This means students in the suburbs and students in the cities would all perform at high levels.

The class of 2003 will be the first group of students who must pass the MCAS. Passing is defined as scoring one point above failing in English Language Arts and Math. The science curriculum frameworks is being re-developed so the class of 2003 will not have to pass a science MCAS test in order to earn a state diploma.

Let us take a look at the latest set of MCAS scores for eighth graders - the class of 2003, the first class that must pass MCAS. This can help us understand where we are in terms of student achievement.

Statewide- that is all eighth graders who took the 1999 MCAS test from all of our communities - 13% of students failed the English language Arts MCAS test. That's good. On the Math test, 40% failed, not as good.

Those general averages don't tell the entire story, however. When you look at test results in terms of different kinds of communities, we can begin to appreciate the true dimension of the challenge for Massachusetts education reformers.

Click here to view MCAS Grade 8:
Class of 2003 Fail Percentage Graphic

This chart breaks down performance on the 1999 MCAS 8th grade test in terms of performance by school district demography (see Footnote 2). Students in advantaged systems did much better than did students in less advantaged systems. That is no surprise. What is surprising to many observers is the very large differences in the student pass rates of different kinds of communities in Massachusetts.

Kids will have to pass both math and English MCAS tests to graduate with a state diploma in 2003. The limiting factor for success here is Math; Math is a much tougher test for Massachusetts students to pass than is English. So, since students of the Class of 2003 must pass both English and Math, the Math fail rate is the key determinant of who passes MCAS tests.

Statewide 40% of 8th graders failed Math. For the Very Advantaged communities, Weston and such, the fail rate was 12%. For the Very Challenged communities - primarily the cities - the fail rate was 65%. While the Very Challenged communities only number 25, they are home to about 30% of out students.

MCAS Progress1998-1999

In the seven years since passage of the Education Reform Act of 1993 we have only had two administrations of the MCAS assessments. I say "only" because I, like many others, assumed that there would be four or five MCAS tests given during the first phase of education reform. But, at day's end, we have two administrations of MCAS upon which to evaluate reform progress since 1993.

The key variable with which we are concerned is progress - how did we do this year as compared to last year? In a perfect world, students would make solid progress each year towards meeting achievement goals. This chart illustrates what happened between 1998 and 1999 in terms of MCAS scores.

Click here to view the All Grades MCAS 1998-1999 Graphic

Between 1998 and 1999, MCAS scores went up about 13 scaled score for 4th graders points (all three subjects combined), went down about 13 scaled score points for 10th graders, and stayed about the same for 8th graders.

Hancock v. Board of Education

There clearly is more work to be done to move all children up the achievement ladder. There is a new lawsuit on the books, Hancock v. Board of Education, which is asking the court to reconsider education reform after seven years. Brockton again is home to the lead plaintiff. This time the suit alleges that, even after equalizing spending, some systems simply do not provide the same quality education that others do and that this difference is unconstitutional. I will be doing more work on Hancock v. the Board down the road, but it is likely to shape much of the education reform discussion for the next few years.

For more information, please contact the UMass Donahue Institute, (617) 287-7055 or contact Robert Gaudet, (617) 469-6843; rgaudet@rnc.com

         Home | School Improvement | Community | The MCAS | Resources | Site Map | Search | Contact
         © 2001 Education Benchmarks | Website Design by Chris Bell